GRE作文机考经验分享
为帮助大家准备gre考试内容，小编在此分享GRE作文机考经验。希望对大家有所帮助!
GRE作文机考经验分享
我的GRE作文已经考完了，由于很努力地准备，导致考场上RP爆发，Issue抽到超高频，Argu是考试前最后一次模拟考试写过的，所以考场上就是直接默写。现在我把我以前在看帖子过程中收集到的考场上的两个有用的小技巧贡献给大家，请还没考得同学注意了。
第一个是补习老师在他的课堂上透露的得小技巧，就是写作文的界面上几个按钮中唯独缺少“copy”功能，可以通过按两次“cut”,然后再点 “paste”来替代。在考场中这一招很有用，特别是Argu中，把前面打的观点，专有名词直接粘贴，能节约3、4分钟宝贵时间。
另外一个是我在太傻论坛一张不起眼的帖子上看到的。机考Issue前有一个适应性练习，规定不能超过30分钟，让考生熟悉软件的用法并且填一张调查问卷。其中有一个部分是熟悉键盘的使用，但是我就按照前辈的做法，利用这个机会，先在键盘上狂敲了一遍Issue和argu的模板，然后把平常用但容易打错的单词敲了几遍。
大家可不要小看这个细节，它能让你迅速回忆起模板，进入状态。否则有的人本来就紧张，结果开始写Issue时手就哆嗦。不过要注意控制好时间，前面部分不能超过规定的30分钟。我当时就兴奋过了头，幸好善良的监考官从摄像头里看见过了二十多分钟我还在练打字，赶紧跑过来叫我做后面的调查问卷。
GRE作文机考注意事项
GRE作文考试的流程
考生首先应熟悉GRE作文考试的流程，一般情况下，考生从到达考场到考试完毕，通常分为以下六步：
第一、考生查考号，领取柜子钥匙和夹着纸的硬板，纸上是所要抄的誓言。听完监考老师讲完注意事项后，就开始抄誓言，写地址条(考生收信地址，英文格式和邮政编码)。
第二、把随身携带的所有东西(除了两个证件之外)都存入柜子里。任何食品、饮料、滴眼液等与考试无关的物品都不允许带入考场。注意：考试过程中是不允许脱衣服的，所以考生要视环境冷热而行。
第三、监考老师开始检查考生的证件，发草稿纸(六张)。
第四、老师按号要求考生照相(对着摄像头)，核对姓名和地址之类的。然后考生进考场，耳塞都挂在电脑桌的隔板上，两支铅笔放在桌上。
第五、开始考试后，首先熟悉键盘和鼠标和填写背景调查(这两个步骤都可以跳过)，填写两个笔考考场。然后写ISSUE和ARGUMENT。最后填写送分学校。
第六、到了考场门口把草稿纸还给老师。
注：各个考场可能细节上不太一样，考生们应视具体情况而定。另外，考生还应注意几个问题。
注意问题一：必须带好的证件
准考证号是注册时候发到邮箱里面的那封邮件上面的号码，邮件不用打印出来，只要考试时记着号码就可以。
参加GRE/GMAT考试的考生要携带两类有效证件，其中至少有一个是第一类证件。第一类证件至少有一种是护照、正式居民身份证或军官证.第二类证件可以是驾驶证、带钢印的工作证(不接受工作卡) 、往来港澳通行证、外国人居留证、港澳居民回乡证或由正规大专院校颁发的学生证(不含五大：电视大学、夜大学、职业大学、业余大学、函授大学;其他任何培训性质的院校或培训项目颁发任何形式的证书均不接受)。
缺少第二类证件，可到考生本人所在学校学生处、单位人事部门、户籍所在地派出所、档案所在人才交流中心、街道办事处开具身份证明信(户籍所在地派出所开具的证明信应该是有照片、盖有户籍章的格式打印户籍证明。其他证明信需有本人照片、本人签字、本人身份证号码，个人体貌特征描述和经办单位人事部门电话，经办人签字，并且在照片上盖有介绍单位的公章)。
按照ETS要求，考场不接受以下证件作为考试证件：(但不仅限于此)：临时证件(包括临时身份证、临时驾驶执照、临时工作证等)，过期的证件(包括过期身份证、过期驾驶执照、过期工作证等)，国际驾驶执照，社会保险卡 ，任何信用卡 ，公证函 ，工作卡 ，出入证(卡)。
未按要求出示证件的考生，考场有权拒绝其参加考试。持任何假证件的考生不能参加考试。证件方面如果出现问题(例如身份证遗失)或者出现自己无法确定的情况，请千万提前打电话到考试中心询问清楚相关事宜。
另注意，如果发生证件不全情况，考试中心会要求考生尽快拿回证件，但是一天只有2场考试，如果在最后一场考试开始后还没有带来，就不能再考试了。最后一场在上午11点到场。
提醒：请各位务必自行确认有效证件，避免出现_放弃考试甚至全盘计划被打乱，事后再后悔不迭的情况出现!
注意问题二：草稿纸的问题
进入考场之后，工作人员会发给每一个考生两支铅笔，六张草稿纸。进去之前一定要数一下确认。六张草稿纸是钉在一起的，不要弄散，出来的时候要还回去，一张也不能少，发现少了会很麻烦。如果考场上不发草稿纸，可以给考点要索取。
注意不要在做问卷的时候写模板。很多考生在做作文前的问卷调查时就在草稿纸上写模板了，这是不允许的，会被视作作弊。考生可以适当的写一些提纲，这样会在写作时有清晰的思路。
注意问题三：时间的分配
整个考试总共120分钟。在最前面在电脑上填写一些个人信息之类的，以及让你熟悉界面，是45分钟。 ISSUE 45分钟，ARGUEMNT 30分钟，这样就是120分钟。 ISSUE和ARGUMENT两个部分之间没有休息时间。
如果之前已经用PP3模拟考过的，最前面那45分钟的很多内容都可以跳过去。但是跳过去的部分节省的时间不能算到作文里。一旦选择结束这个调查和熟悉界面的部分，考试立即开始.，即看到作文题时记时已经开始。所以审题和列提纲的时间都是在45/30分钟内。
另外，左下角有个倒记时的小钟，前40分钟可以点击它，使左上角的数字倒计时消失。但最后5分钟无论你愿意不愿意，左上角的倒计时都会出现。
注意问题四：考试时的界面是TXT
TXT只有复制剪切粘贴的功能，没有WORD的纠错功能。虽然平时模考的pp3在windows下执行的时候右键仍然可以用(因为是文本框)，真正考试的时候鼠标的左右键是完全一样的，所以提醒惯用鼠标右键进行cut或者paste等操作的考生，平时准备的时候要注意到这一点，实际考试时没有这种快捷键。
注意问题五：免费寄成绩的学校的填写
考试前要想好确定自己要填哪几所学校，哪个专业。学校的选择是按国家、州、学校、专业来选的，所以考生只要知道学校的全称和学校在哪个州。BULLETIN上也有学校代码。虽然给出的选择的州名不是全称，但也不是两个子母的缩写，每个人只要知道州名的全称都可以分辨出来那种形式州名的缩写。如果实在不确定，可以向监考老师询问。建议考生选与自己水平适合的中等大学，太好的先别选。
注意问题六：表和耳机
关于用来计时的表，如果你想带进考场，一定要戴指针的，手机或其它电子计时器是不被允许的。
关于耳机，各个考点所提供的耳机是不同的。建议大家开始就戴上耳机，因为周围嘈杂的键盘声和因错误操作而产生的不绝于耳的“滴滴”声可能会影响考生的情绪。
注意问题七：考完之后
笔考准考证(AdmissionTicket)从美国ETS本部寄出，目前没有明确的数据表明在作文考试几天之后一定可以拿到准考证。如果在笔考日期之前的2到3个礼拜仍没有拿到准考证，请立刻与ETS本部联系。Email地址为：gre-info@ets.org。
能否取得高分，不仅取决于你准备的充分与否，而且在于你发挥的如何。如果你已经准备的很完备，适当的注意一下可能会遇到的问题，熟悉一下考试的过程，参考一下经验，你就会更加得心应手。
GRE写作满分范文1
ing?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
The?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?should?lose?his?job.??It?is?clear?that?his?analysis?of?the?decrease?in?attendance?in?the?past?year?was?incomplete.??A?better?qualified?individual?might?have?explored?the?issue?further?by?doing?several?different?things.??First?of?all,?surveys?of?the?general?population?could?provide?a?clue?to?the?decreased?viewership.?They?may?find?that?people?aren't?as?willing?to?pay?the?high?prices?anymore.??A?survey?may?also?reveal?that?people?are?aware?of?Silver?Screen,?but?opt?not?to?see?the?films.??An?inspection?of?the?nature?of?the?films?made?by?Silver?Screen?could?also?hint?to?the?root?of?the?problem.??If?Silver?Screen?produces?a?lot?of?the?same?type?of?movie,?then?the?problem?may?be?that?they?don't?produce?enough?to?appeal?to?the?diverse?interests?of?the?population.??For?instance,??if?their?movies?typically?contain?excessive?violence?and?foul?language,?parents?won't?take?their?children?to?these?films.??That?is?a?significant?portion?of?the?potential?viewing?population?lost.??
The?ad?director?mentions?that?reviewers?liked?specific?films?and?gave?more??favorable?reviews?than?in?the?past.??But?he?neglects?to?mention?the?specific?numbers-?critics?may?have?raved?about?2?movies?and?turned?their?thumbs?down?the?10?others.??If?thats'?the?case,?it's?no?wonder?that?viewership?has?declined.??
Spending?more?on?advertising,?and?less?on?production,?as?the?ad?director?suggests,?could?drive?the?company?out?of?business.??If?the?media?builds?alot?of?hype?over?a?new?release?that?was?poorly?produced,?people?are?more?likely?to?be?disappointed,?and?skeptical?about?future?productions.??This?is?certainly?not?in?the?company's?best?interests.?What?is?in?the?company's?best?interest?is?a?broader?scope?of?the?problem,?and?different?approaches?to?solving?i??
Commentary??
This?strong?response?begins?with?an?attack?on?the?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?but?quickly?shifts?to?identifying?major?flaws?in?the?argument.??The?main?points?of?the?critique?are?that??
--?the?real?reasons?for?a?decline?in?viewership?have?not?yet?been????identified;?
--?Silver?Screen?may?not?produce?different?kinds?of?movies?to?appeal?to????diverse?interests;?
--?the?number?of?favorably?reviewed?movies?may?actually?have?been????very?low;?and?
--?spending?money?to?produce?a?possibly?poor?movie?could?hurt?rather than?help?the?company.??
Although?more?points?are?made?here?than?are?made?in?the?sample?6?response?on?this?topic,?each?of?the?points?made?in?the?6?paper?is?developed.??That?is?not?the?case?here.??In?this?response,?each?point?is?supported?(by?perhaps?an?additional?sentence),?but?it?is?not?further?developed.??The?paper?is?smoothly?organized?with?few?but?appropriate?transitions.??The?writing?is?strong?with?some?variety?in?syntax.??For?these?reasons,?this?response?earns?a?score?of?5.?
GRE写作满分范文2
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
Although?the?reasoning?in?this?arguement?is?logical,?the?writer?failed?to?consider?other?reasons?for?the?disparity?between?the?percentage?of?people?attending?the?company's?movie?and?the?percentage?of?favorable?reviews.??Perhaps?the?fault?lies?with?the?reviewers?and?not?the?production?company;?the?public?may?not?trust?the?critics'?reviews.??Another?posibility?for?the?attendance?drop?is?that?the?general?public?does?not?find?the?subject?matter?of?the?movies?enticing.??If?that?were?the?case,?spending?less?on?producing?new?movies?in?an?effort?to?re-direct?funds?to?advertising?could?backfire?by?further?limiting?the?types?of?movies?available?to?the?potential?audience.??Maybe?the?general?public?is?simply?not?impressed?with?the?critically-acclaimed?qualities?of?the?movies?(such?as?eloquent?screenplays,?artful?cinematography,?and?realistic?acting)?and?and?would?prefer?seeing?flashy?special?effects?and?big-name?stars.??The?possible?reasons?for?the?attendance?decline?are?numerous;?even?aspects?not?directly?related?to?the?movie?industry?(such?as?the?improving?quality?of?television?programming?and?the?increasing?popularity?of?home?computer?use)?may?play?large?roles.??The?company's?management?would?be?wise?to?consider?and?study?the?entire?realm?of?possibilities?before?making?drastic?changes?in?its?budget?based?on?one?statistical?discovery.??
Commentary??
This?response?identifies?and?analyzes?some?important?flaws?in?the?argument.??Although?the?number?of?points?mentioned?is?the?same?as?that?in?the?sample?5?paper,?this?response?remains?at?the?4?score?level?because?the?points?of?the?critique?are?only?minimally?developed?or?supported.??
The?essay?identifies?four?points:??
--?the?public?might?not?trust?critics?
--?the?movies'?subject?matter?might?not?be?appealing
--?the?public?might?prefer?seeing?special?effects?or?big-name?stars?rather????than?good?cinematography?or?realistic?acting?
--?perhaps?improvement?in?TV?programming?or?increased?use?of?home????computers?has?kept?people?away?from?movie?theaters??
Ideas?in?the?response?are?conveyed?well?and?clearly;?the?use?of?language?is?generally?strong.??But?the?paper's?"bare-bones"?analysis?gives?it?a?list-like?quality.??It?is?therefore?merely?adequate?and?merits?a?score?of?4.?
GRE作文机考经验分享相关文章：