GRE作文3分容易考么
GRE考试中，写作部分的总分值为6分，那么如果作文想要拿到3分的成绩，是容易还是难呢?具体的在备考的过程中，同学们应该怎么备考，才能够拿到GRE写作3分以上的成绩呢?下面小编为大家整理了详细的内容，供大家参考!
GRE作文3分容易考吗
在新GRE作文中的另一个普遍问题是写作速度太慢，这显然是因为在考试前所作的准备不够充分。GRE考试的写作除了开头段和结尾段，中间一般应该写三段。但是考生在规定时间内往往只能写两段，而且字数也不够，只能写400字左右。GRE写作虽然没有字数要求，但是一篇较好的、成熟的，能够充分展示自己观点的GRE作文，一般应在600字左右，或者是600字以上。由此可见，一篇400字左右的文章在内容上是不够充实的。
多准备针对性素材提升论述说服力
在备考过程中要多准备例子，并把它们一一写下来，进行分类。一个例子往往可以应对好几个同类的题目，这样做是效率最高的办法。
坚持写作练习克服畏难情绪
我们都害怕写作文，想到要练习写一整篇文章，往往就没有了信心。其实我们可以从练习写作开头段，然后设计文章的提纲开始。写开头段能够让我们以轻松一点的心情着手GRE写作的准备，并且迅速了解所有的题目，因为GRE的题目数量是固定的。
储备积极词汇，用时得心应手。从备考的开始就要着手增加working vocabulary, 当然也包含词组，成语。平时背的词汇往往只是看到它能知道其中文的某个翻译意思，但是我们却不能灵活运用这些词汇进行表达，更不用说在短暂的GRE写作考试时间内用它们遣词造句了。
ETS官网GRE作文3分范文赏析
As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Essay Response — Score 3
There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. For example, the problem of dibilitating illnesses and diseases such as alzheimer's disease is slowing being solved by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing new brain cells and the possibility to reverse the onset of alzheimer's is now becoming a reality. This shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think.
One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds is the use of internet and cell phones. In the past humans had to seek out information in many different enviroments and aspects of life. Now humans can sit in a chair and type anything into a computer and get an answer. Our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularily substituted for other information sources such as human interactions and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.
Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 3
This essay never moves beyond a superficial discussion of the issue. The writer attempts to develop two points: that advancements in technology have progressed our knowledge in many fields and that supplementing rather than relying on technology is "surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race." Each point, then, is developed with relevant but insufficient evidence. In discussing the potential of technology to advance knowledge in many fields (a broad subject, rife with possible examples), the writer uses only one limited and very brief example from a specific field (medicine and stem-cell research).
Development of the second point is hindered by a lack of specificity and organization. The writer creates what might be best described as an outline. The writer cites a need for regulation/supplementation and warns of the detriment of over-reliance upon technology. However, the explanation of both the problem and solution is vague and limited ("Our reliance ... can be detrimental. If humans understand that we should not have such a reliance ... we will advance further"). There is neither explanation of consequences nor clarification of what is meant by "supplementing." This second paragraph is a series of generalizations that are loosely connected and lack a much-needed grounding.
In the essay, there are some minor language errors and a few more serious flaws (e.g., "The future ability of growing new brain cells" or "One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds"). Despite the accumulation of such flaws, the writer's meaning is generally clear. Thus, this essay earns a score of 3.
GRE写作关于字数的限制
字数并不是越多越好。试想，改卷人批上那么多试卷，头都大了，每一份都想尽快看完，根本不可能仔细研读，写了太多反而招致反感。但语言思辩一定要清晰，要抓住改卷人的好奇心、注意力，让他跟着你走，吸引他迫切想知道你下面会说什么。所以这就要求语言一定要流畅。
我自己有个毛病不知道是否也有人一样，就是思维跳远，往往造成不必要的省略和重复。因为下笔之前总是要先构思一下句子，想得越多越导致条约，如此会使文章读起来不连贯。我的朋友们看我写的作文都有这样的看法。这个也没什么好办法解决，只能说自己多熟练好文章的表达，培养语感，脱口而出啦。
一般来说，400字差不多了。另外，这里要提醒大家的是，不能光在机器上练啊，也得动动手啦，老是不写字手很生涩的。而且就我自己而言，打字的速度和写字的速度差别很大，特别是英文。
GRE写作高分的几点经验
第一，文章开始点明中心句
在每一段开始的第一行，最好能明确地表达你想说什么，也就是中心句。
这做法虽然死板，但往往有奇效。特别是对自己逻辑推理不是很有信心的各位，说清楚了，没说全面总比说都没说清楚要好。
第二，写作这个东西其实是相通的
我们中的很大一部分在高考结束后恐怕很少再写这么长的，同时主题又相对深刻的文字。英文只是一个表达方式，而论证过程则和中文没有任何区别。如果实在觉得难以上手，不妨先试试写一篇自己认为很深刻的中文文章看看。在逻辑和思想方面，这样的训练方式会有奇效，同时对于心理是一个不小的鼓舞。
第三，有关范文
范文是一定要看的，看什么。我建议，开始的时候，不要纠结于某某单词的某某用法，大不了你写的时候不用就是了。要大略的看，看作者是怎么展开题目，从哪几个方面入手，各自怎么论证的。
很重要的一点是，不要迷信范文。没有任何证据表明你看到的这篇范文出自一位逻辑学大师的手，即便确实如此，对于同一问题有不同的见解这是再正常不过的事情。思路可以借鉴，但千万不要僵化。
与此本质相同的另一个方法是，请别人改作文，就观点改或就文字改，按个人情况取舍。
第四，专门练习句子
如果真的想兼顾文字，不如在练逻辑练累的时候(我知道很容易累，很枯燥)，专门拿出一点时间去写一些句子，效果更好。
如果说模版的话，这样就足够了。模版这个东西，背太多没好处，太容易局限思维，还有雷同的风险。
第五，培养找到错误的能力
还要说明一点，以上是针对整个AW而言。对于argument，特别需要注意的是培养找到错误的能力。
具体方法是，阅读一定量的题目。这样的好处有二：
一、通过阅读题目，只找错误来训练。
二、没有谁能保证argument里面不会出现一个你不认识的单词，万一是个关键词，那可就……
argument其实和issue也是想通的，锻炼一者的同时另一者一定也会提高，所以不要纠结浪费时间的问题。
第六，关于机经
我的意见是，反正写什么都是写，不如按照机经写。当然，如果能写很多很多，那我的意见没有什么参考价值。
GRE作文3分容易考吗相关文章：
GRE作文3分容易考么
上一篇：gre分类词汇整理大全
